You know how you have fixed rates with your vendors, but no mechanism that actually checks what you're invoiced against them.
The rate card was negotiated hard, then filed. Nobody compares it to the invoices line by line.
Variances get spotted by accident, usually by someone who was looking for something else.
Checking it properly has never won against delivery work, and it never will.
We build the checking and reporting: contracted rate against invoiced rate, line by line, with a monthly report of discrepancies and savings — and we carry the work, not your team.
Line-level reconciliation
Contracted rate, invoiced rate, variance — per line, not per invoice. Summary-level checking hides exactly what you're looking for.
Evidence attached to every finding
Each variance references the contract clause, the rate card version and the invoice line, so it's recoverable rather than arguable.
A monthly report, not an accusation
Findings go to the vendor as evidence on a cadence. Good vendors welcome it, because it ends the argument.
A control you keep
The check is documented and handed over, so it becomes a standing control rather than a one-off recovery.
So that you get what you agreed to pay for, and MCMS carries the vendor-management heavy lifting instead of your delivery team.
$10.6M
Client savings driven by data analysis
Fifteen minutes on a call is usually enough for both of us to know whether this is a job for MCMS.
Run by our vendor management team, with cost management checking the numbers and distribution management covering logistics providers and their rates.
Multi-site delivery
You know how a rollout that works on one site starts falling apart at forty, and nobody can tell you which site is actually behind.
Independent review
You know how you're asked to sign off a project record you didn't build and can't fully verify.
Data
You know how you collect data in multiple places and multiple documents, so nobody can give leadership a straight answer.
