← What we fix
Multi-site delivery

You know how a rollout that works on one site starts falling apart at forty, and nobody can tell you which site is actually behind.

Eight integrators, eight versions of the truth, one master schedule nobody trusts.

The slip is always found at the handoff, never inside anyone's scope.

You asked for headcount and didn't get it. The rollout didn't slow down to wait.

What we do

We run the delivery layer above your integrator stack — reconciling the handoffs, holding named accountability, and reporting one version of site-by-site reality every week.

One weekly view of every site

Site-by-site status your delivery lead can read in ten minutes, built from what integrators are actually doing rather than what they reported.

Named people, not a bench

The individuals who ran a 102-building, 64-country rollout for one of the world's largest technology companies, pointed at your programme with a phone number attached.

Handoff ownership

A written RACI for every integrator seam and a named person accountable for it, so slippage has somewhere to land before it reaches you.

A one-site pilot first

Fixed scope, existing MSA, no new legal cycle. If it doesn't earn wider scope on its own merits, nothing else happens.

What changes

So that the programme lands on the dates you already committed to, and the postmortem, if there is one, has a named owner that isn't only you.

Multi-site rolloutIntegrator reconciliationProgramme reportingFixed-scope pilot

102

Buildings secured across 64 countries

What you're left holding

Forensic governance ends with evidence you hold, not a verbal assurance.

01

A site-by-site status record built from source, not from integrator self-reporting

02

A written RACI naming who owns every handoff between contractors

03

A standing risk and change register your delivery lead can hand to anyone