You know how a rollout that works on one site starts falling apart at forty, and nobody can tell you which site is actually behind.
Eight integrators, eight versions of the truth, one master schedule nobody trusts.
The slip is always found at the handoff, never inside anyone's scope.
You asked for headcount and didn't get it. The rollout didn't slow down to wait.
We run the delivery layer above your integrator stack — reconciling the handoffs, holding named accountability, and reporting one version of site-by-site reality every week.
One weekly view of every site
Site-by-site status your delivery lead can read in ten minutes, built from what integrators are actually doing rather than what they reported.
Named people, not a bench
The individuals who ran a 102-building, 64-country rollout for one of the world's largest technology companies, pointed at your programme with a phone number attached.
Handoff ownership
A written RACI for every integrator seam and a named person accountable for it, so slippage has somewhere to land before it reaches you.
A one-site pilot first
Fixed scope, existing MSA, no new legal cycle. If it doesn't earn wider scope on its own merits, nothing else happens.
So that the programme lands on the dates you already committed to, and the postmortem, if there is one, has a named owner that isn't only you.
102
Buildings secured across 64 countries
Forensic governance ends with evidence you hold, not a verbal assurance.
A site-by-site status record built from source, not from integrator self-reporting
A written RACI naming who owns every handoff between contractors
A standing risk and change register your delivery lead can hand to anyone
Fifteen minutes on a call is usually enough for both of us to know whether this is a job for MCMS.
Run by our project management and security design teams, with vendor management alongside on the supply side, distribution management getting kit to each site on time, and our training team handling familiarisation for site staff at handover.
Independent review
You know how you're asked to sign off a project record you didn't build and can't fully verify.
Data
You know how you collect data in multiple places and multiple documents, so nobody can give leadership a straight answer.
Contract and vendor performance
You know how you have fixed rates with your vendors, but no mechanism that actually checks what you're invoiced against them.
